In EUREQA, every question is constructed through an implicit reasoning chain. The chain is constructed by parsing DBPedia. Each layer comprises three components: an entity, a fact about the entity, and a relation between the entity
and its counterpart from the next layer. The layers stack up to create chains with different depths of reasoning. We verbalize reasoning chains into natural sentences and anonymize the entity of each layer to create the question.
Questions can be solved layer by layer and each layer is guaranteed a unique answer. EUREQA is not a knowledge game: we adopt a knowledge filtering process that ensures that most LLMs have sufficient world knowledge to answer our questions.
EUREQA comprises a total of 2,991 questions of different reasoning depths and difficulties. The entities encompass a broad spectrum of topics, effectively reducing any potential bias arising from specific entity categories.
These data are great for analyzing the reasoning processes of LLMs
PerformanceHere we present the accuracy of ChatGPT, Gemini-Pro and GPT-4 on the hard set of EUREQA across different depths d of reasoning (number of layers in the questions). We evaluate two prompt strategies: direct zero-shot prompt and ICL with two examples. In general, with the entities recursively substituted by the descriptions of reasoning chaining layers, and therefore eliminating surface-level semantic cues, these models generate more incorrect answers. When the reasoning depth increases from one to five on hard questions, there is a notable decline in performance for all models. This finding underscores the significant impact that semantic shortcuts have on the accuracy of responses, and it also indicates that GPT-4 is considerably more capable of identifying and taking advantage of these shortcuts.
| depth | d=1 | d=2 | d=3 | d=4 | d=5 | |||||
| direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | |
| ChatGPT | 22.3 | 53.3 | 7.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 39.2 | 3.7 | 39.3 | 7.2 | 39.0 |
| Gemini-Pro | 45.0 | 49.3 | 29.5 | 23.5 | 27.3 | 28.6 | 25.7 | 24.3 | 17.2 | 21.5 |
| GPT-4 | 60.3 | 76.0 | 50.0 | 63.7 | 51.3 | 61.7 | 52.7 | 63.7 | 46.9 | 61.9 |
Attempting to access or download from tamilblasters.net.in – even a "verified" version – exposes you to five major risks.
| Platform | Tamil Content | Price (Monthly) | Free Trial | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Yes (Extensive library of old & new Tamil films) | ₹299 (or ₹1,499/year) | 30 Days | | Disney+ Hotstar | Yes (Tamil originals & live TV) | ₹299 (Super) | 7 Days | | Netflix | Growing (Ray, Jagame Thandhiram, etc.) | ₹199 (Mobile) | 30 Days | | ZEE5 | Yes (Huge archive of Tamil movies) | ₹199 (Annual plan ~₹499) | 14 Days | | Sony LIV | Yes (Movie premieres) | ₹299 (Annual) | 30 Days | | Aha Tamil | Exclusively Tamil content. | ₹199 (or ₹699/year) | 7 Days |
When users see the term "verified" attached to a TamilBlasters URL, it does not mean the site is verified by Google, cybersecurity firms, or any government body. Instead, the term originates from two sources:
This website has been banned in India, and the government has frequently succeeded in shutting down major piracy websites. However, as a TOI investigation noted, the moment one site is blocked, a new wave of platforms quickly emerges to offer the same illegal services, making it a "global whack-a-mole problem" for enforcement agencies. tamilblastersnetin verified
The specific string (often formatted as tamilblasters.net.in ) is simply one node in a massive, rotating chain of proxy and mirror domains. When one domain is blocked by Internet Service Providers (ISPs), the network simply pushes a new URL to its user base via Telegram, encrypted messaging apps, or sister "link-list" sites.
Pop-up ads that automatically trigger silent downloads of malicious software.
The most significant blow to this piracy network came in 2025, when the Hyderabad Cyber Crime Police announced the dismantling of what has been hailed as India's largest movie piracy syndicate. The investigation revealed a highly sophisticated, multi-state criminal racket that was linked to 1TamilBlasters and caused an estimated loss of to the Telugu film industry alone. Attempting to access or download from tamilblasters
The reality is that a "verified" link in the context of TamilBlasters is essentially an oxymoron. There is no official safe harbor, and every click carries a risk of malware infection or data theft.
Internet service providers log user traffic. Accessing flagged piracy nodes can result in warning notices, bandwidth throttling, or temporary service suspension.
Deep within the vast, humming architecture of the global web, there was a digital lighthouse known to many as TamilBlasters. For years, it served as a gathering place for cinephiles, a sanctuary where the vibrant stories of Kollywood—the pulse of Tamil cinema—were shared across continents. But as the tides of the internet grew more turbulent, the path to this sanctuary became obscured. Instead, the term originates from two sources: This
TamilBlasters is a popular torrent website that leaked copyrighted content, primarily focusing on South Indian cinema, including Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Kannada films. It operates similarly to TamilRockers, frequently changing its domain extension (e.g., .com, .net, .in, .unblock) to evade legal shutdowns and censorship. The Risks of Using "Verified" Proxy Sites Accessing sites like tamilblasters.net.in carries significant risks for users: Legal Consequences
In legal web browsing, a "verified" site usually implies security certificates or official brand validation. In the piracy ecosystem, "verified" has a completely different meaning.
Labeling a link as "verified" is a psychological tactic used by site operators and third-party scammers to build false trust with visitors. Safe and Legal Alternatives
This website is adapted from Nerfies, UniversalNER and LLaVA, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. We thank the LLaMA team for giving us access to their models.
Usage and License Notices: The data abd code is intended and licensed for research use only. They are also restricted to uses that follow the license agreement of LLaMA, ChatGPT, and the original dataset used in the benchmark. The dataset is CC BY NC 4.0 (allowing only non-commercial use) and models trained using the dataset should not be used outside of research purposes.