Many Venezuelans living abroad seek access to historical registries to verify past civil status or collect documentation regarding political persecution for asylum claims. Conclusion
El diputado a la Asamblea Nacional, (fallecido en 2010), argumentó que era necesario verificar la autenticidad de las rúbricas para evitar un presunto "mega fraude". Con el aval del gobierno, Tascón obtuvo copias físicas y digitales de las planillas de firmas entregadas al Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE).
While originally a searchable online database, it is often circulated today as a lista tascon pdf full
: Includes full names, national ID numbers (cédula de identidad), and signatures of those who supported the recall. Political Categorization
The remains one of the most controversial and significant political documents in modern Venezuelan history [1]. Originally compiled in 2004, this list contained the names, identification numbers, and signatures of over 2.4 million citizens who petitioned for a recall referendum against then-President Hugo Chávez [1]. Decades later, researchers, historians, and legal professionals still search for the "lista tascon pdf full" to study its structural impact on human rights and political discrimination [1]. Many Venezuelans living abroad seek access to historical
In late 2003 and early 2004, the Venezuelan opposition gathered over to trigger a recall referendum against President Chávez, as permitted by the 1999 Constitution. Following Chávez’s public denunciation of the petition as an "act against the country," legislator Luis Tascón obtained the names and ID numbers of the signatories and published them on his website. This act was widely viewed as a breach of electoral privacy and a tool for intimidation. Socioeconomic and Political Consequences
El uso de esta lista trascendió la simple verificación de firmas y se utilizó como una herramienta de persecución política. While originally a searchable online database, it is
"Una represalia en su contra por haber ejercido legítimamente un derecho de carácter político constitucionalmente previsto" (a reprisal against them for having legitimately exercised a constitutionally protected political right)
have reported its continued use for political profiling as recently as 2021. Human Rights Watch Usage in Asylum and Legal Cases